MVP has escalated his public criticism of Triple H, this time drawing a direct comparison to The Undertaker and arguing that the Deadman was ultimately more valuable to WWE because of his consistent willingness to elevate other performers throughout his career.
Speaking on his Marking Out podcast, MVP challenged fans to name wrestlers who became bigger stars because of Triple H, while noting that the same exercise produces a much longer list when applied to Undertaker.
“You can go down the list and you can think of talents that Taker worked with that he elevated and got them over. How many people do you remember, the nose, Triple H, in his career getting over? How many people can you associate with him? And I’ll give you two. I’ll give you Randy. I’ll give you Batista. Take them away. Who else can you remember triple nose getting over?” MVP said.
He also pointed to a specific moment involving Jeff Hardy as an example of Triple H failing to fully give the rub to a babyface opponent, describing the manner in which Triple H sold a loss.
“I remember the finish because it was a three-count and he sat up smiling like, ‘Gosh, golly, he got me.’ Not, ‘Boom, oh man, I’m hurt, oh man.’ He, I know the man, I worked with the man. Your ego, I mean, your opinion versus my experience are very different. He wouldn’t even give that to Jeff Hardy where, ‘Oh man, he beat me.’ He got up, sat up, and like, ‘He got me,'” MVP said.
He then framed the argument in terms of long-term value to the company, using a hypothetical to show why he places Undertaker ahead of Triple H on that measure.
“Triple H, top guy, drew a lot of money, was a player. Undertaker, top guy, drew a lot of money, was a player. If Undertaker made, let’s just say for the sake of our conversation, through the course of his career, 10 other guys, and then the nose (Triple H) got two or three other guys over that he elevated them, in the big scheme of things, the big picture, who was more valuable for the company? The guy (The Undertaker) who was a top guy who knew how to get himself over and get other people over,” MVP said.
MVP was then asked, ‘Aren’t you paid to be the main attraction and not the facilitator?’
“Absently not. That’s the problem, because you have guys that have that ego where it’s all about me,” MVP added.
The comments continue MVP’s recent pattern of publicly criticizing Triple H. In late 2025, he praised Tony Khan while describing WWE under Triple H as more corporate and fear-driven compared to AEW’s locker room environment.
If you use any portion of the quotes from this article, please credit the Marking Out podcast with a h/t to WrestlingNews.co for the transcription.
